AP CID Says Report On Gorantla’s Video Is Faux

Andhra Pradesh CID chief Sunil Kumar mentioned that the forensic report stating that YCP MP Gorantla Madhav’s video is authentic, was faux. A couple of days in the past, TDP spokesperson Pattabhi mentioned that US-based forensic science laboratory, Eclipse Forensic Lab, had confirmed that Gorantla’s nude video was authentic. The forensic report additionally went viral identical to the MP’s nude video.

The CID chief mentioned that Jim Stafford of Eclipse Lab had despatched a mail to him affirming that the certificates issued in his identify was faux. Sunil mentioned that the video given to the forensic lab to establish whether or not it was authentic or morphed was not shot instantly however videogrpahed whereas being performed on one other display screen. He even cited the instance of ace director Rajamouli’s movie RRR and mentioned that the director might have used graphics within the movie but when a viewer within the theatre shoots it on his cell system and offers the identical for examination to the forensic lab, they’d say it isn’t morphed because the video shot within the cinema is authentic. “The reality that graphics have been inserted into the movie would get revealed provided that the unique video of the film whereas being shot by the director would come out,” Sunil mentioned.

“Jim Stafford had advised me that he was not requested to find out the authenticity of the video being performed and haven’t supplied an opinion of it. Stafford additionally mentioned that with out analyzing it, I can’t speculate whether it is genuine or not,” the CID chief advised the reporters.

The intimate dialog between the MP and a girl would get recorded solely on their respective mobiles however not on a 3rd one recording their chat, he identified. The forensic lab authorities would be capable of establish if the video was morphed or authentic provided that the display screen recording on the cellphones of the lady or the person concerned within the dialog are submitted to them. “It’s extremely unimaginable to authenticate a video recorded whereas being performed on one other display screen.”

The CID chief additionally mentioned that because the forensic report was fabricated, authorized motion can be taken in opposition to these concerned within the forgery. He mentioned that stories submitted by personal forensic labs would haven’t any validity.